Submission Preparation ChecklistAs part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
- The manuscript must be prepared for blind review. This includes making sure that references to the author(s) are removed from the file properties.
- Manuscripts should be between 4,000 and 8,000 words in length. Longer and shorter manuscripts will be considered, provided that they are accompanied by a justification for deviating from the word limits.
- References should appear in footnotes (not in endnotes or the main text), and all sources should be listed in a bibliography at the end of the article. While we allow for stylistic flexibility at the submission stage, we encourage authors to stay as closely to De Ethica's style of referencing (see below) as possible.
- The manuscript should be in .doc- or rtf.-format. Submissions should only be sent using the submission form above. If the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author will be asked to submit the finished version in .doc-format.
- The submission email should include two separate files: (i) an author information file containing title and subtitle of the paper, name(s) and affiliation(s) if any of the author(s), contact information, an abstract consisting of between 150 and 200 words, and five to six key words, and (ii) the manuscript itself, with abstract and key words, with all identifying references removed (including information in the file properties).
- Submission of the manuscript is taken to imply that it has not been previously published elsewhere. It is also taken to imply that the manuscript is not and will not be under review elsewhere until the Editors of De Ethica have reached a decision.
- Legal responsibility for the content of a submission and a published article lies with the author. This means, inter alia, that the author is required to obtain permission to use previously published material where necessary, and that they must credit all of their sources in an appropriate manner.
The data collected from registered and non-registered users of this journal falls within the scope of the standard functioning of peer-reviewed journals. It includes information that makes communication possible for the editorial process; it is used to informs readers about the authorship and editing of content; it enables collecting aggregated data on readership behaviours, as well as tracking geopolitical and social elements of scholarly communication. The data is safely stored on a server at Linköping University.
This journal’s editorial team uses this data to guide its work in publishing and improving this journal. Data that will assist in developing this publishing platform may be shared with its developer Public Knowledge Project in an anonymized and aggregated form, with appropriate exceptions such as article metrics. The data will not be sold by this journal or PKP nor will it be used for purposes other than those stated here. The authors published in this journal are responsible for the human subject data that figures in the research reported here.
Those involved in editing this journal seek to be compliant with industry standards for data privacy, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provision for “data subject rights” that include (a) breach notification; (b) right of access; (c) the right to be forgotten; (d) data portability; and (e) privacy by design. The GDPR also allows for the recognition of “the public interest in the availability of the data,” which has a particular saliency for those involved in maintaining, with the greatest integrity possible, the public record of scholarly publishing.