Globalisation and Global Justice - A Thematic Introduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.16315Keywords:
Abstract
Globalisation involves both promising potentials and risks. It has the potential – through the spread of human rights, the migration of people and ideas, and the integration of diverse economies – to improve human wellbeing and enhance the protection of human rights worldwide. But globalisation also incurs risks: global environmental risks (such as global warming), the creation of new centres of power with limited legitimacy, a ‘race to the bottom’ regarding workers’ safety and rights, risky journeys of thousands of migrants and not least growing global inequalities. Globalisation, therefore, is a key factor for today’s discussions of justice.As globalisation connects people, it also raises associated responsibilities between them. Until recently, the interest in justice among political philosophers and social ethicists was mainly focused on the nation state. However, this is no longer feasible. Since economic globalisation affects how wealth and power are distributed globally it has become indispensable to discuss social ethics in a global context and to develop principles of global justice. Global justice, therefore, entails an assessment of the benefits and burdens of the structural relations and institutional arrangements that constitute and govern globalisation.
The academic discussion of global justice is vibrant and expanding. In my introduction I provide an overview of the discussions on global poverty, justice, cosmopolitanism and statism, migration, the capability approach and different dimensions of global justice.
References
Armstrong, Chris. Global Distributive Justice. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Bauman, Zygmunt. Globalization. The Human Consequences. Oxford: Polity Press, 1998.
Benhabib, Seyla. The Rights of Others, Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511790799
Beitz, Charles. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
Brock, Gillian. Global Justice, A Cosmopolitan Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001
Buchanan, Allen. ‘Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World’,Ethics 110 (2000), pp. 697-721. DOI: 10.1086/233370
Carens, Joseph H. The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Collste, Göran. Global Rectificatory Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2015.
Miller, David. Citizenship and National identity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
Miller, David. ‘Immigration: The Case for Limits’, in Contemporary Debates in AppliedEthics, edited by Andrew I. Cohen and Christopher Heath Wellman. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005, pp. 193-206.
Nagel, Thomas. ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 33:2 (2005), pp. 113–147. DOI: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x
Nussbaum, Martha. C. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511841286
Oxfam., Wealth: Having It All and Wanting More (2005). Online at: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/ib-wealthhaving-
all-wanting-more-190115-en.pdf (accessed 2016-03-21).
Pogge, Thomas. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Pogge, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.
Pogge, Thomas. ‘Real World Justice’, The Journal of Ethics 9 (2005), pp. 29-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10892-004-3313-z
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Scholte, Jan Aart. ‘Rethinking Social Justices for a Global World’, in Societas Ethica’sAnnual Conference 2015: Globalisation and Global Justice, edited by Göran Collste. Linköping: Linköping Electronic Press, 2015, pp. 14-17.
Sen, Amartya. The Idea of Justice, Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2009.
Singer, Peter. ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 1:3 (1972), pp. 229-243.
Singer, Peter. One World. The Ethics of Globalization, 2 ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
Singh, Aakash. ‘Deparochializing the Global Justice Debate, Starting with Indian Political Theory’, Global Policy 4:4 (2013), pp 418-419. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12092
Tan, Kok-Chor. Justice Without Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490385
United Nations. We can end poverty (2005). Online at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (accessed 2016-03-21).
UNICEF. ‘The Millennium Development Goals’. Online at: http://www.unicef.org/mdg/index _childmortality.htm (accessed 2016-03-21).
Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice, A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
Wisor, Scott. ‘Against Shallow Ponds: An Argument against Singer’s Approach to Global Poverty’, Journal of Global Ethics 7:1 (2011), pp. 19-32. DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2010.548819
World Bank. Poverty (2013). Online at: www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty (accessed 2016-03-21).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Collste
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.