What Good is Meaning in Life?

  • Christopher Woodard University of Nottingham, UK
Keywords: Meaning in life, final value, instrumental value, negative meaning, meaninglessness

Abstract

Most philosophers writing on meaning in life agree that it is a distinct kind of final value. This consensus view has two components: the ‘final value claim’ that meaning in life is a kind of final value, and the ‘distinctness claim’ that it is distinct from all other kinds of final value. This paper discusses some difficulties in vindicating both claims at once. One way to underscore the distinctness of meaning, for example, is to retain a feature of our pre-theoretical concept of meaning in life, according to which the least possible quantity of meaning is meaninglessness. Unfortunately, this makes it harder to defend the claim that meaning is a kind of final value. On the other hand, revising the concept to allow for negative meaning renders meaning closer in structure to other kinds of final value, but also makes it harder to defend the distinctness claim. In light of these difficulties, the paper explores the prospects of a theory of meaning in life which departs from the consensus view by rejecting the final value claim. On such a view, the value of meaning in life is entirely instrumental.

References

Adams, Robert M. A Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207510.001.0001

Brogaard, Berit and Barry Smith. 'On Luck, Responsibility and the Meaning of Life'. Philosophical Papers 34: 3 (2005), pp. 443-458.
https://doi.org/10.1080/05568640509485167

Campbell, Stephen. M. and Sven Nyholm. 'Anti-Meaning and Why It Matters'. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (2015), pp. 694-711.
https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2015.9

Crescioni, A. Will and Roy F. Baumeister. 'The Four Needs for Meaning, the Value Gap, and How (and Whether) Society Can Fill the Void', in The Experience of Meaning in Life: Classical Perspectives, Emerging Themes, and Controversies, edited by Joshua A. Hicks and Clay Routledge. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 3-15.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6527-6_1

Dorsey, Dale. 'Subjectivism without Desire'. Philosophical Review 121 (2012), pp. 407-42.
https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1574436

Kagan, Shelly. 'Well-Being as Enjoying the Good'. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (2009), pp. 253-272.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00170.x

Kauppinen, Antti. 'Meaning and the Good Life', online at https://www.academia.edu/28978139/Meaning_and_the_Good_Life (accessed 2017.03.13), pp. 1-19.

Kershnar, Stephen. 'Thad Metz's Fundamentality Theory of Meaning in Life: A Critical Review'. Science, Religion and Culture 1 (2014), pp. 97-100.

Matheson, David. 'Creativity and Meaning in Life'. Ratio, online first (2016). doi:10.1111/rati.12153
https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12153

Metz, Thaddeus. 'Recent Work on the Meaning of Life'. Ethics 112 (2002), pp. 781-814.
https://doi.org/10.1086/340462

Metz, Thaddeus. 'New Developments in the Meaning of Life'. Philosophy Compass 2 (2007), pp. 196-217.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00061.x

Metz, Thaddeus. Meaning in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599318.001.0001

Metz, Thaddeus. 'Meaning as a Distinct and Fundamental Value: Reply to Kershnar'. Science, Religion and Culture 1 (2014), pp. 101-106.

Nozick, Robert. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1981.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999 (1971).

Smuts, Aaron. 'The Good Cause Account of the Meaning of Life'. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 51: 4 (2013), pp. 536-562
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12044

Strawson, Galen. 'Against Narrativity'. Ratio XVII (2004), pp. 428-452.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2004.00264.x

Sumner, L. Wayne. Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

Svennson, Frans. 'Why Subjectivism About Meaning In Life Might Not Be So Bad After All'. Unpublished MS, 2015.

Tang, David, Nicholas J. Kelley, Joshua A. Hicks, and Eddie Harmon-Jones. 'Emotions and Meaning in Life: A Motivational Perspective', in The Experience of Meaning in Life: Classical Perspectives, Emerging Themes, and Controversies, edited by Joshua A. Hicks and Clay Routledge. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 117-128.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6527-6_9

Višak, Tatjana. 'Understanding Meaning of Life in Terms of Reasons for Action'. Journal of Value Inquiry 51: 3 (2017), pp. 507-530.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-017-9591-z

Williams, Bernard A. O. 'Moral Luck', in Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 20-39.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165860

Wolf, Susan. 'Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life'. Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (1997), pp. 207-225.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001734

Wolf, Susan. Meaning in Life and Why it Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t3cm

Published
2017-12-04
How to Cite
Woodard, C. (2017) “What Good is Meaning in Life?”, De Ethica, 4(3), pp. 67-79. doi: 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.17467.
Section
Articles