Evil as a Distortion of Communication: On Hegel’s account of Evil as Subjectivism

Authors

  • Martin Sticker Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.18513

Keywords:

Hegel, conception of evil, communication, distorted communication

Abstract

The early Hegel’s conception of evil draws on a very different paradigm than the current philosophical discourse on evil and therefore challenges received assumptions and can give us fresh impulses. In this paper, I first present Hegel’s conception of evil through a close reading of the Jenaer Realphilosophie’s, prima facie, obscure claim that evil is the ’internal actual, absolute certainty of itself, the pure night of being for itself‘. Hegel discusses evil because he worries how Romanticism and the romantic ideal of authenticity impact the possibility of communication. I then develop the idea that evil is a distortion of communication. I argue that this account of evil helps us to distinguish between evil and mere moral badness. Finally, I address two problems for this account, and discuss its limits.

References

Barry, Brian. ‘Extremity of Vice and the Character of Evil’, Journal of Philosophical Research, 35 (2010), pp. 25-42. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2010_2

Beiser, Frederick. The Romantic Imperative. The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003

Behler, E., et. al. (eds.). Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1979. Bernstein, Richard. Radical Evil. A Philosophical Interrogation. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2002.

Bubner, Rüdiger. ‘Zur Dialektischen Bedeutung romantischer Ironie’, in Innovationen des Idealismus, edited by Rüdiger Bubner. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1995, pp. 152-163.

Card, Claudia. The Atrocity Paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195145089.001.0001

Firchow, Peter. Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde and the Fragments . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.

Formosa, Paul. ‘A Conception of Evil’, The Journal of Value Inquiry 42:2 (2008), pp. 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-008-9118-8

Formosa, Paul. ‘Evils, Wrongs and Dignity: How to Test a Theory of Evil’, The Journal of Value Inquiry 47:3 (2013), pp. 235-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-013-9380-2

Frank, Mandfred. ‘Philosophische Grundlagen der Frühromantik’, Athenäum, 4 (1994), pp.37-130

Frischmann, Bärbel. Vom transzendentalen zum frühromantischen Idealismus. J.G. Fichte und Fr. Schlegel. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2005.

Garrard, Eve. ‘The Nature of Evil’, Philosophical Explorations 1:1 (1998), pp. 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10001998018538689

Garrard, Eve.‘Evil as an Explanatory Concept’, The Monist 85:2 (2002), pp. 320–36. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist200285219

Goldberg, Zachary. ‘Evil, ‘Evil’, and Taking Responsibility’, in Wozu ist das Böse gut?, edited by Birgit Recki. Münster: Mentis, 2016, pp. 17–36.

Göhler, Gerhard. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Frühe politische Systeme. Frankfurt a.M.: Ullstein, 1974.

Haybron, Daniel. ‘Moral Monsters and Saints’, The Monist, 85:2, pp. 260–284.

Hegel, G. W. F. Gesammelte Werke. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 1968ff.

Hegel, G. W. F.Werke (eds. Michel Moldenhauer), Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1970.

Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1900 ff.

Kekes, John. Facing Evil. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

Kekes, John.The Roots of Evil. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.

Morton, Adam. On Evil. New York: Routledge, 2004.

Norman, Judith. ‘Squaring the Romantic Circle’, Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America 14 (2000), pp. 131-144. https://doi.org/10.5840/hsaproceedings20001410

Moyar, Dean. Hegels Conscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391992.001.0001

Neiman, Susan. Evil in Modern Thought. An Alternative History of Philosophy. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.

Perrett, Roy. ‘Evil and Human Nature’, The Monist 85:2 (2002), pp. 304-19. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist200285220

Pinkard, Terry. “Phänomenologie des Geistes” Translation, draft, online at http://terrypinkard.weebly.com/phenomenology-of-spirit-page.html

Pöggeler, Otto. Hegels Kritik der Romantik. Bonn: Bouvier, 1956.

Sticker, Martin and Daniel Wenz. ‘System und Systemkritik – Witz und Ironie als philosophische Methode beim frühen Friedrich Schlegel’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 120:1 (2013), pp. 64-81.

Sticker, Martin. ‘Hegel und die Wurzel der Humanität’, Hegel Jahrbuch (forthcoming).

Wood, Allen. G. W. F. Hegel Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-07

How to Cite

Sticker, M. (2018) “Evil as a Distortion of Communication: On Hegel’s account of Evil as Subjectivism”, De Ethica, 5(1), pp. 3–20. doi: 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.18513.

Issue

Section

Articles