On the Relevance of the Concept of Intrinsic Evil: Francisco Suárez and Contemporary Catholic Virtue Ethics Approaches

Authors

  • Nenad Polgar University of Vienna, Austria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.185121

Keywords:

Intrinsic evil, Virtue ethics, Object of the act, Intention/End, Account of evil.

Abstract

The article explores the relevancy of the concept of intrinsic evil/intrinsically evil acts in contemporary Catholic theological ethics as a particular way of giving an account of (moral) evil. The argument proceeds in two steps. In the first step the author turns to Francisco Suárez as one of the first theologians who tried to deal with the concept of intrinsic evil in an extensive and systematic way. The point of this historical exploration is to determine the meanings of this concept as it started to appear more frequently in the ethical discourse. In the next step the author presents two contemporary positions within Catholic theological ethics, those of Joseph Selling and Dana Dillon. Although both authors are proponents of virtue ethics, they disagree fundamentally on the role of the concept of intrinsic evil within this approach. While Joseph Selling argues in favour of eliminating this concept from theological ethics, Dana Dillon posits that theological ethics cannot function without it. In the rest of the article, the author explores this disagreement through various ways in which the concept can be used, while taking into account the aforementioned meanings of the concept. In the end, the author sides with Joseph Selling, since the concept of intrinsic evil does not seem to be able to fulfil the role it was assigned within Catholic theological ethics.

References

Aquinas, Thomas, Quaestiones Quodlibetales. Edited by Raymundi Spiazzi. Turin: Marietti, 1956.

Aquinas, Thomas. ‘Summa theologiae I-II’. Edited by Joseph Kenny. Online at http://dhspriory.org/thomas (accessed 2017-11-05).

Bretzke, James. ‘Debating Intrinsic Evil’. Horizons 41:1 (2014), pp. 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2014.30

Dedek, John. “Moral Absolutes in the Predecessors of St. Thomas’. Theological Studies 38:4 (1977), pp. 654-680. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056397703800402

Dedek, John. ‘Intrinsically Evil Acts: An Historical Study of the Mind of St. Thomas’. The Thomist 43:3 (1979), pp. 385-413. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1979.0023

Dedek, John. ‘Intrinsically Evil Acts: The Emergence of the Doctrine’. Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 50 (1983), pp. 191-226.

Dillon, Dana L. ‘Debating Intrinsic Evil’. Horizons 41:1 (2014), pp. 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2014.31

Gordley, James. ‘Suárez and Natural Law’, in The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez, Benjamin Hill and Henrik Lagerlund. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583645.003.0012

Grisez, Germain. ‘Revelation versus Dissent’, in Considering Veritatis Splendor, edited by John Wilkins. Clevelend, OH: The Pilgrim Press, 1994, pp. 1-8.

Irwin, Terence. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study: Volume II: From Suárez to Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

John Paul II. Veritatis splendor. Online at http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/ documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor.html (accessed 2018-04-24).

Keenan, James F. ’History, Roots, and Innovations: A Response to the Engaging Protestants’, in Ecumenical Ventures in Ethics: Protestants Engage Pope John Paul II’s Moral Encyclicals, edited by Reinhard Hütter and Theodor Dieter. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1998, pp. 262-288.

McWhorter, Matthew R. ‘Intrinsic Moral Evils in the Middle Ages: Augustine as a Source of the Theological Doctrine’. Studies in Christian Ethics 29:4 (2016), pp. 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946816658720

Pace, Paul. ’Suárez and the Natural Law’, in A Companion to Francisco Suárez, edited by Victor M. Salas and Robert L. Fastiggi. Leiden: Brill, 2015, pp. 274-296.

Pinckaers, Servais. The Pinckaers Reader: Renewing Thomistic Moral Theology. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2005.

Rhonheimer, Martin. ‘Intrinsically Evil Acts and the Moral Viewpoint: Clarifying a Central Teaching of Veritatis splendor’, in Veritatis Splendor and the Renewal of Moral Theology, edited by Joseph A. DiNoia and Romanus Cessario (Princeton, NJ: Scepter Publishers, 1999), pp. 161-193.

Selling, Joseph A. Reframing Catholic Theological Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198767121.001.0001

Suárez, Francisco. Opera omnia. vol. 4-5. Paris: Vivès, 1856.

Suárez, Francisco. ’De legibus ac Deo legislatore’, in Selections from Three Works, edited by Thomas Pink. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2015, pp. 5-752.

Wolbert, Werner. ‘Tendencies in Catholic Moral Theology as Reflected in Veritatis Splendor’. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 47:1-2 (2000), pp. 220-245.

Wolter, Allan B. and William A. Frank. Duns Scotus: On the Will and Morality. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1997.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-07

How to Cite

Polgar, N. (2018) “On the Relevance of the Concept of Intrinsic Evil: Francisco Suárez and Contemporary Catholic Virtue Ethics Approaches”, De Ethica, 5(1), pp. 21–36. doi: 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.185121.

Issue

Section

Articles