Political Decay and Political Arcadianism

Authors

  • Ronnie Hjorth Swedish Defence University, Stockholm, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.185137

Keywords:

Political Decay, Political Arcadianism, Political Theory, Ethics

Abstract

An account of evil in classical political theory is the concept of evil government. The notion of political decay from good to evil government or to anarchy, the absence of government, among classical political theorists represents both a moral and a political problem. This essay argues that political decay remains a perennial problem because the political condition itself involves the seeds to its own destruction. Moreover, it is claimed that the nostalgic longing to a glorious past for nations or peoples risks turning into what is here labelled ‘political arcadianism’, fostering futile attempts to return to past conditions. The argument is that political arcadianism when focusing on the imagined past rather than the present is a possible cause of political decay.

References

Adorno, Theodor W. & Horkheimer, Max. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Verso, 1999.

Arendt, Hannah. ‘Social Science Techniques and the Study of the Concentration Camps’. Jewish Social Studies 12:1 (1950), pp. 49-64.

Arendt, Hannah. Between the Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. London: Faber & Faber, 1961.

Arendt, Hannah. The Origin of Totalitarianism. London: André Deutsch, 1986.

Arendt, Hannah. ‘Philosophy and Politics’. Social Research 57:1 (1990), pp. 73-103.

Arendt, Hannah. ‘Introduction Into Politics’, in The Promise of Politics, edited by Jerome Kohn. New York: Schocken Books, 2005).

Auden, W. H. For the Time Being: A Christmas Oratory, edited by Alan Jacobs. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013.

Aristotle. Politics, edited by H. Rackham. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1932. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-politics.1932

Bauman, Zygmunt. Retrotopia. London: Polity Press, 2017.

Baumgold, Deborah. Hobbes’s Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project, translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge Mass. & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.

Brett, Annabel. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: The Walter Scott Publishing Company.

Burns, J.H. & Goldie, M. (eds). The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521247160

Cohen, Morris. Law: The Art of Justice. New York: Hugh Lauter Levin, 1992.

D’Ancona, Matthew. Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press, 2017.

Dobson, Andrew. Green Political Thought, 3rd Edition. London & New York: Harper Collins, 2000.

Eliot, T.S. Four Quartets. New York: Harcourt, 1971.

Eliot, T.S. The Wasteland and Other Poems. New York: Harcourt, 1962.

Fukuyama, Francis. Political Order and Political Decay. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2014.

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.

Hobbes, Thomas, De Cive. Indianapolis, IN & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, 1993.

Holy Bible. King James Version. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lane, Melissa. Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518492

Malcolm, Noel. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247145.001.0001

Malreddy, Kumar Pavan et al (eds). Reworking Postcolonialism: Globalization, Labour and Rights. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137435934

Meier, Heinrich. Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Moore, G.E. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922.

Oakeshott, Michael. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1996.

Oakeshott, Michael. Hobbes on Civil Association. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2000.

Plato, Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Plato, Statesman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Rosen, Stanley. Plato’s Statesman: The Web of Politics. New York: Yale University Press, 1995.

Rosen, Stanley. Plato’s Republic: A Study. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2005.

Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.

Slomp, Gabriella. Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984437

Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953.

Strauss, Leo. ‘What Can We Learn from Political Theory?’. The Review of Politics, 69:4 (2007 [1942]).

Velkley, Richard L. Heidegger, Strauss, and the Premises of Philosophy: On Original Forgetting Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.

Zuckert, Michael P. & Zuckert, Cathrine H. Leo Strauss and the Problem of Political Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226135878.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2018-05-07

How to Cite

Hjorth, R. (2018) “Political Decay and Political Arcadianism ”, De Ethica, 5(1), pp. 37–49. doi: 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.185137.

Issue

Section

Articles