On Some Moral Implications of Linguistic Narrativism Theory
Keywords:narrativism, moral responsibility, ethics, constructivism, moral intuitionism, moral volitionism, moral vision
In this essay we consider the moral claims of one branch of non-realist theory known as linguistic narrativism theory. By highlighting the moral implications of linguistic narrativism theory, we argue that the “moral vision” expressed by this theory can entail, at worst, undesirable moral agnosticism if not related to a transcendental and supra-personal normativity in our moral life. With its appeal to volitionism and intuitionism, the ethical sensitivity of this theory enters into difficulties brought about by several internal tensions as to what morality and moral judgements involve. We contend that the proponents of linguistic narrativism theory must strongly recognize and take responsibility for the “moral vison” their theory professes, in so far as they want to think of their theory as a morally responsible one.
Anscombe, G.E.M. ‘On Brute Facts’, in Ethics, Religion and Politics: Collected Philosophical Papers Vol. III. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981, pp. 22–25.
Barthes, Roland. Empire of Signs. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1982
Barthes, Roland. ‘Historical Discourse’, in Structuralism: A Reader, edited by Michael Lane, translated by Peter Wexler. London: Jonathan Cape, 1970, pp. 145–155.
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. New York: The Noonday Press, 1972.
Bauman, Zygmunt. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
Brewer, Talbot. The Retrieval of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Carr, David. Experience and History: Phenomenological Perspectives on the Historical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199377657.001.0001
Didi-Huberman, Georges. Bark. Translated by Samuel E. Martin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11239.001.0001
Doran, Robert. The Ethics of Theory: Philosophy, History, Literature. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.
Dupré, John. ‘Fact and Value’, in Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions, edited by Harold Kincaid, John Dupré and Alison Wylie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 27–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.003.0003
Engel, Pascal. ‘Volition and Voluntarism About Belief’, in Belief, Cognition and the Will, edited by A. Meijers. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1999, pp. 9–25.
Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. ‘Ethics and Method’, History and Theory 43:4 (2004), pp. 61-83.
Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. History in the Discursive Condition: Reconsidering the Tools of Thought. New York: Routledge, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203831434
Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. Sequel to History: Postmodernism and the Crisis of Representational Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.
Foucault, Michel. ‘On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress’, in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984: Vol I, edited by Paul Rabinow. New York: The New Press, 1997, pp. 253–280.
Foucault, Michel. ‘The History of Sexuality’, in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1980, pp. 183–193.
Froeyman, Anton. ‘Never the Twain Shall Meet? How Narrativism and Experience can be Reconciled by Dialogical Ethics’, History and Theory 54:2 (2015), pp. 162–177.
Gilbert, Bennett. A Personalist Philosophy of History. New York: Routledge, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351216265
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being and Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects: Book I-III, edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1881.
Jenkins, Keith. ‘The End of the Affair: On the Irretrievable Breakdown of History and Ethics’, Rethinking History 11:2 (2007), pp. 275–285.
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals, in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, edited by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 37–108.
Kronqvist, Camilla. ‘Westermarck and Moore on the Sources of Morality’, in Evolution, Human Behaviour and Morality: The Legacy of Westermarck, edited by Olli Lagerspetz, Jan Antfolk, Ylva Gustafsson and Camilla Kronqvist. New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 129–141.
Leiter, Brian. ‘Normativity for Naturalists’, Philosophical Issues: A Supplement to Noûs 25:1 (2015), pp. 47–79.
Lévinas, Émmanuel. Otherwise than Being, or Beyond Essence. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7906-3
Moore, George Edward. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922.
Murdoch, Iris. ‘Metaphysics and Ethics’, in Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature, edited by Peter Conradi. New York: Penguin Books, 1997, pp. 59–75.
Murdoch, Iris. ‘Vision and Choice in Morality’, in Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature, edited by Peter Conradi. New York: Penguin Books, pp. 76–98.
Murdoch, Iris. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Vintage, 2003.
Pihlainen, Kalle. ‘The Moral of the Historical Story: Textual Differences in Fact and Fiction’, New Literary History 33:1 (2002), pp. 39–60.
Pihlainen, Kalle. ‘The Work of Hayden White II: Defamiliarizing Narrative’, in The SAGE Handbook of Historical Theory, edited by Nancy Partner and Sarah Foot. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013, pp. 117–135.
Pihlainen, Kalle. The Work of History: Constructivism and a Politics of the Past. London: Routledge, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315521619
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Volume 1. Translated by Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Volume 3. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Existentialism is a Humanism. Translated by Carol Macomber. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. Moral Skepticisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195187725.001.0001
Tolstoy, Leo. Anna Karenina. Translated by L. and A. Maude. New York: Knopf, 1992.
White, Hayden. ‘Historical Pluralism and Pantextualism’, in The Fiction of Narrative: Essays on History, Literature, and Theory 1957-2007, edited by Robert Doran. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010, pp. 223–236.
White, Hayden. The Practical Past. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2014.
White, Hayden. ‘The Public Relevance of Historical Studies: A Reply to Dirk Moses’, History and Theory 44:3 (2005), pp. 333–338.
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Wyschogrod, Edith. The Ethics of Remembering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Zeleňák, Eugen. ‘Who Should Characterize the Nature of History? The Wrong Question?’, Storia della Storiografia 59–60 (2011), pp. 171–182.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Natan Elgabsi, Bennett Gilbert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.