Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation

Lessons from Gandhian Thought

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the potentials of the Gandhian conceptual framework for proposing strategies to reduce tensions among communities and nations, and to reconcile broken relations. The analysis focuses on three major Gandhian concepts such as i) ahimsa which denotes nonviolence, ii) satyagraha which signifies non-cooperation and civil disobedience, and iii) antyodaya which implies concern for the disadvantaged and victims. First, the discussion attempts to identify the methods proposed by the Gandhian framework for avoiding potential conflicts that might lead to violence. The paper examines manifold implications of the concept of nonviolence and elucidates both the merits and limits of the concept in contemporary contexts. Secondly, the paper analyses the feasibility of the strategy of nonviolent non-cooperation, which compels parties involved in the conflict to look for possible solutions. Thirdly, the paper elucidates the possibility of drawing substantial support from Gandhian thought to defend our obligation to be on the side of victims of aggressions and transgressions. Finally, the paper evaluates the constraints of the Gandhian framework in responding to sudden and unanticipated crises, its excessive demandingness, and the problem of impossible possibilities.